Jehovah’s Witnesses Face “Worldwide Reckoning”

In a follow-up article that continues his earlier reporting about the recent Jehovah’s Witness sex abuse case heard in Montana, Seaborn Larson of the Missoulian ties up the loose ends and expands upon the longterm effects that the case may have on the Watchtower organization. We present and preserve it for your consideration as follows:

Montana Jehovah’s Witness sex abuse case underscores church’s worldwide reckoning

THOMPSON FALLS — Perhaps the largest jury award ever to a single person claiming the Jehovah’s Witnesses church failed to protect her from a sexual predator came Wednesday in Thompson Falls, a 1,300-person town peeking out from the pines along Highway 200 in northwest Montana.

The jury’s award, $35 million in punitive and compensatory damages to one woman, is more than financial relief, the woman’s attorneys say. It’s a message to the church: If leadership won’t amend their policies in handling child sex abuse, they’re going to pay for it.

In 2012, a California jury awarded one woman $28 million for her own claims against the Witnesses. Her attorney said it was the largest jury verdict for a single victim in a religious abuse case in the entire country at that time. The payout is a direct reflection of the church’s enormous and — most importantly — centralized wealth at the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, located in Pennsylvania and New York.

The Montana case is the most recent in a global reckoning for the Jehovah’s Witnesses, not unlike the ones seen with the Catholic Church and Boy Scouts of America. The number of cases filed against the church has accelerated in local and federal courts across the United States, alleging that church leadership stifled child sexual abuse allegations and returned known predators to congregations without warning other Witnesses.

The Australian Royal Commission conducted its own probe into the church’s practices regarding the handling of abuse and known predators, finding more than 1,000 allegations were never turned over to authorities.

The bedrock policies revealed by these public proceedings come in two steps:

Reports of abuse are to be forwarded to the legal department in the church’s highest offices, which in turn direct congregation elders to conduct proceedings internally and not report these crimes to authorities.

The other part — the first part, technically — is what’s known as the “two-witness rule,” which requires an allegation of abuse to be bolstered by two witnesses before leadership takes any action.

Barbara Anderson, once a Jehovah’s Witness herself, said that rule is borrowed literally from the Scripture.

“They’re literalists,” she said, “and that’s a very, very old command.”

Anderson now lives in Tennessee, but she once lived in New York, where she wasn’t just a Witness, but a researcher in the church’s headquarters there. She told the Missoulian this week she left the church in 1997, after more than 40 years as a dedicated Witness, in protest of the policies that facilitate the cover-ups like the one in Thompson Falls.

And she’s been sharing the church’s internal documents online ever since, helping propel cases like this one toward justice. 

In 2016, two women sued Watchtower and the Thompson Falls congregation alleging they were abused, molested and raped by member Maximo Reyes, both before the elders “disfellowshipped” him from the membership and after they reinstated him about a year later.

The first woman, Holly McGowan, said Reyes abused her for several years, when she was as young as 9, and reported it to church leadership in 1998. She alleged they did nothing because of the second-witness rule.

The Missoulian typically does not name victims of sexual assault. Both women named in this story agreed to allow the Missoulian to use their names.

There were only five exhibits entered during trial, but prosecutors really only needed four to prove the Thompson Falls elders knew Reyes had molested multiple children, including by Reyes’ own admission, in 2004.

After McGowan submitted a two-page letter on March 19, 2004, outlining Reyes’ assaults on her and another girl, the elders notified the high levels of the church and requested documents in order to officially sever Reyes from the congregation.

When the Christian Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, a high-ranking church office in New York, issued the disfellowship papers and typed a letter to the Thompson Falls elders, they requested that the elders follow up with a letter containing more details: How long did the abuse go on? How old were the victims? Are members of the congregation aware of what took place?

“The community nor the authorities are aware of this matter,” the elders replied on April 21, 2004. “The members of the congregation are also at this time unaware of what took place. The only ones that we are aware of that know are Maximo, his wife and mother of the children. … The victims feel disgust toward Maximo.”

On June 16, 2005, the elders reinstated Reyes in the congregation at his request. Alexis Nunez, then an 8-year-old girl, would later tell the elders he sexually assaulted her on a near-weekly basis for the next two years.

Before the trial, attorneys for Watchtower requested Judge James Manley, the District Court judge for Sanders and Lake counties, order that a number of these exhibits remain confidential through the process.

They gave several reasons, including assertions the victim’s attorneys wanted them so they could release them to the media and in turn “harass/embarrass” the church. 

Manley denied the request to seal the documents. The Missoulian obtained and paid for copies of them from the District Court clerk’s office.

Neil Smith, a Texas attorney who represented McGowan and Nunez, said litigating the case was difficult because he also had to bat away claims that certain documents were to be confidential because of religious protections.

“This is such an extremely secretive organization that refuses to provide honest answers,” he said.

Attorneys for Watchtower did not return emails seeking comment for this story.

“This case was about exposing a system that protects the Jehovah’s Witness organization by keeping its victims quiet,” said McGowan and Nunez in a statement emailed Friday night.

“We were taught at a young age not to talk to secular authorities and to trust the elders to handle any issues — even child abuse. That system took our voice away from us. This case was about getting our voice back and being heard. We feel like we accomplished that. However, we know one case won’t be enough to make the Jehovah’s Witnesses change their policies. We hope that other victims will hear our story and feel the strength to speak up and fight as well.”

Because the church said it had no documentation of McGowan’s 1998 report to the elders, the jury said in its verdict that the plaintiffs’ attorneys had not proved McGowan had made that report at all, and therefore couldn’t prove her allegations had been tossed aside.

Montana’s mandatory reporter statute made a big difference in this case, attorneys said. Certain exceptions exist for clergy. For example, the revelation of abuse or neglect made during a confession or in a statement that’s meant to be confidential can be withheld by clergy.

But Jim Molloy, a Bozeman attorney who joined Smith in representing the plaintiffs, said those loopholes couldn’t apply here. Reyes admitted the abuse to the elders when they approached him about it, not in confession. What’s more, they spread that information to others, including up the Witness chain to Watchtower. 

“This is not a case where the Thompson Falls congregation went rogue,” Smith said. “This isn’t about them. It’s the puppet masters in New York who issued orders by the threat of punishment from God.”

The same policies and procedures have been aired out in proceedings against the Jehovah’s Witnesses around the world. Yet the church remains set in its ways, Anderson said, because of how the religious leaders hold their beliefs above the law. Romans 13 in the Bible that says “Let every person be in subjection to the superior authorities, for there is no authority except by God.”

“I left the organization over this issue,” she said. “No one appointed them as magistrates, they’re spiritual judges. If they want to judge someone on this matter, they’ll take action against them in a religious sense.”

Anderson herself was born Catholic but her family joined the Witnesses when she was 14. She married a Witness and eventually found herself working as a researcher for the congregation’s magazine, Awake!, and living in the Watchtower’s home base, a 4,000-person complex once located in Brooklyn, New York. 

While at the magazine, she learned about the church’s process of internalizing matters of child abuse and found leadership reluctant to publish anything notifying its members of the emerging numbers of accused. 

She said a letter from her editor in 1997 was the final straw. The correspondence praised the church’s legal department for protecting the church against any more “megabuck lawsuits.” The children, she recalled, seemed to be secondary.

That same year, Watchtower issued instructions to congregations around the world to report known predators to the headquarters. Over the next four years, according to Anderson’s continued research, Watchtower received 775 names of known pedophiles in congregations in the U.S. 

In 2015, a comprehensive investigation into the church by the Australian Royal Commission found the Jehovah’s Witnesses in Australia had received allegations against more than 1,000 members, relating to at least 1,800 victims, since 1950 and did not report a single allegation to law enforcement. Of the 1,006 accused, 579 had confessed to the crimes, according to the report, and of those known child abusers, 28 had been appointed to be elders or ministerial servants.

Anderson used these figures to compile a 113-page report, which in May she submitted to the Attorney General’s offices in New York and Pennsylvania, hoping a similar probe would take place in the United States into the list of 775 pedophiles known to church officials. As of last week, she had yet to hear back from the New York and Pennsylvania officials on her submission.

The information she’s used in the report has been taken from cases around the country, where she exchanges information with attorneys to help their cases, as well. 

The actual scope of the abuse accusations and the resulting action — or lack thereof — has so far remained out of the public eye. Two cases in San Diego presented the opportunity for the release of all of Watchtower’s internal documents relating to known sex abuse allegations. Judges continued to fine Watchtower as much as $4,000 a day for not turning the internal documents over in the case’s discovery. The church paid millions in those fines until the plaintiffs eventually settled the case outside court. 

The church is fighting the jury’s Thompson Falls verdict, as well, which required $4 million paid to Nunez in compensatory damages, along with $1 million in punitive damages against the Christian Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses and $30 million against Watchtower. Montana law caps punitive damages at 3 percent of the defendant’s net worth or $10 million, whatever is less. 

Molloy believes the actual damages that will be owed to Nunez will be closer to $15 million.

“The jury still sent the message,” he said. “The institutions have to change their policies to protect their children.”

But a senior official in the New York headquarters named Gary Breaux said in a morning worship video posted online that the church would never abandon the prerequisite for others to witness abuse before a religious judicial committee is formed to handle the matter.

“Christ Jesus establishes that there has to be two witnesses,” he said. “The scriptures are very clear.”

“We will never change our scriptural position on that subject.”


The Thompson Falls trial appeared not to have attracted much attention around town last week. Both the bailiff and clerk who were in the courtroom said about a dozen congregation members were the only real audience.

Molloy said it’s unlikely the Watchtower case will have the same sprawling effect locally as, for example, the one that emerged in recent weeks involving a Miles City athletic trainer accused of sexually abusing dozens of boys in the public school from the early 1970s to 1998. The difference, Molloy said, is that the congregation members don’t traditionally venture into friendships outside of the church.

“I think it will reverberate through a small town like Thompson Falls,” he said. “But Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t associate with people outside the faith.”

Still, it’s a small town. Michael Doty, a Thompson Falls resident who left the Jehovah’s Witness congregation over “differences in opinion,” said most everyone still knows everyone.

“The people, for the most part, are very good people,” he said. “They’re human.”

Doty said he knew the victims and their families. Word of abuse came as a surprise, he said. But when told by the Missoulian of the jury’s final verdict in Nunez’s favor on Thursday, he was not shocked — by the verdict or dollar amount.

“It was about time the tide would turn on them,” Doty said.

This article has been updated to clarify that Barbara Anderson’s submission to the Attorney General’s offices in New York and Pennsylvania asked officials to investigate the 775 names of pedophiles in the Jehovah’s Witnesses known to church leaders in the U.S.

LINK to the original article by Seborn Larson

Published October 11, 2018 / Barbara Anderson

Leave a Reply 1

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.



Hi, Although not a Jehovah Witness myself I enjoy their many meetings and teachings. I am spreading this awful news to JW’s that will listen here in London. I don’t want the JW organisation destroyed because in my view they do a great job. Like many I would like to see the JW governing body resign, be put into prison and report all serious crimes in 1 cor 5 to the police and remove from the congration and name/shame as per Mat 2 principal rule which they don’t follow correctly hence gossip.

I’m more than happy for ‘x’ percentage of my contribution to go towrds a fund to recompensate the victims but don’t bankrupt the organisations. Most JW’s are inocent and not taken part of this crime. Kevin